GigaOM » Spam is sucking life out of Email
We all know that spam's a problem. But a recent post on gigaom.com had a stat that caught my eye: quoting a NY times article that said spam "accounts for more than 9 of every 10 e-mail messages."
I knew that it was bad, but since we've set up with Mailfoundry, the number of spam messages that actually make it to my inbox have dropped to fewer than 10 a week - yes, a week.
I'm not suggesting that Mailfoundry is the answer to spam filtering - running mail through Gmail, using SpamAssassin, and any of the many other tools out there are probably equally good.
What I do think is that as the number of spam increase relative to actual mail, we're going to see three things happen:
- spam filtering that happens away from your inbox is going to increase in popularity due to its greater efficiency for the end user (you).
- spam filtering that aggregates the spam reporting of its userbase is going to become ever more effective - think about something like Gmail or Mailfoundry, where many users are marking messages as spam thereby training the filters for everyone. It just makes sense that this sort of approach is going to always be more effective than what you or I can do invididually by training our own anti-spam system.
- some form of verified sender and "pay to send" email is going to arise out of the competing proposals. Making spam unprofitable is the only realistic way I can see to shift this trend. The concept has problems, but spammers are spamming to make money. A serious reduction in the profits would go a long way towards reducing the allure of spamming.
The trick is going to be coming up with a solution that retains the utility of email while signifcantly reducing the spam problem in a manner that doesn't restrict control of who can send email.


Comments